Kristyna Paul vs Lan Mi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How effective is each player's second serve? Kristyna Paul has a slight edge, winning 37.18% of points on her second serve compared to Lan Mi's 35.81%.
• In return games, which player is superior? Lan Mi excels, winning 51.72% of her opponent's second serve points, compared to Kristyna Paul’s 49.60%. Additionally, Lan Mi performs marginally better on first serve returns.
• If the match reaches a critical breakpoint, who is more resilient? Lan Mi saves 43.70% of breakpoints, outperforming Kristyna Paul’s 40.68% in this category.
• Recent overall performance suggests Kristyna Paul has been more successful, winning 58.82% of matches in the past year, whereas Lan Mi has secured 52.63%.
• What is the preferred surface for these players? Both excelled on hard courts, boasting a 61% win rate. However, Kristyna Paul struggles on clay, with no victories there.
• Considering the tournaments they've participated in, Kristyna Paul shows a stronger performance at the Futures/Satellite/ITF $10K events, winning 76.92%, while Lan Mi has a win rate of 62.50%.
• Quality of opposition indicates Kristyna Paul has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 169.76, whereas Lan Mi's opponents averaged 350.37.
• When it comes down to the wire, Kristyna Paul performs better in deciding sets, winning 50%, compared to Lan Mi’s 33% success rate.
• Lan Mi has a higher breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 50.50% of opportunities compared to Kristyna Paul's 32.65%, a vital statistic for in-game strategy.

Editorial Prediction (November 19, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming clash between Lan Mi and Kristyna Paul presents an intriguing matchup, with both players showing strengths in different areas.

Kristyna Paul’s robust performance against higher-ranked opponents and her superior win rate on the ITF $10K circuit suggest she is in excellent form and accustomed to more challenging matches.

On the other hand, Lan Mi’s aggressive return games and break point conversion rate indicate she can capitalize on Kristyna’s weaknesses. However, her tendency to underperform in deciding sets might be a crucial disadvantage.

Considering all factors, including the quality of opponents and recent performance from both competitors, Kristyna Paul appears poised to take the victory in the anticipated match.